M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Recent Additions
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
National Links
International Pages
Information
MoreLaw Marketing
Contact MoreLaw


Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 01-10-2008

Case Style: Oklahoma Pipe and Tube Bending, inc. v. William Samuel Keiser and Keiser Steet, Inc.

Case Number: CJ-2002-6157

Judge: P. Thomas Thornbrugh

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Jonathan Shook, Shook, Huggins & Johnson, P.C., Tulsa, Oklahoma

Defendant's Attorney:

Mike Ashworth, Eldridge Cooper Steichen & Leach PLLC, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Description:

Oklahoma Pipe and Tube Bending, Inc. sued William Keiser and Keiser Steel, Inc. on an embezzelment, conversion, tortious interference, fraud, and breach of trust theories. The specifics of the claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Outcome: ON 1-11-08 AT 6:55 PM, THE JURY RETURNS INTO OPEN COURT WITH THEIR VERDICT, WHICH IS READ IN OPEN COURT, ORDERED, RECORDED AND FILED, AND IS, TO WIT: (BLUE VERDICT FORM): VERDICT FORM ON PLAINTIFF'S MISAPPROPRIATION OR EMBEZZLEMENT CLAIM. "WE THE JURY, EMPANELED AND SWORN IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE, DO, UPON OUR OATHS, FIND IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF, OKLAHOMA PIPE AND TUBE BENDING, INC. AS FOLLOWS:

1. THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF ITS ACTUAL DAMAGES IN THE SUM OF $19,000.

2. WE DO FIND BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT, SAM KEISER, ACTED IN RECKLESS DISREGARD OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS.

3. WE DO NOT FIND BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT, SAM KEISER, ACTED INTENTIONALLY AND WITH MALICE TOWARDS OTHERS" ELEVEN (11) JURORS CONCERRING.

Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: None



 
Home | Add Verdict | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Articles
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2009 MoreLaw.com, Inc.
MoreLaw Marketing
MoreLaw Marketing
Free Marketing

For Lawyers, Forensic Experts, Court Reporters and Other Businesses
Advertise on this site