M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Recent Additions
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
National Links
International Pages
Information
MoreLaw Marketing
Contact MoreLaw


Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 01-08-2001

Case Style: Terri Rose vs. Shawna Vest, Ambassador Home Marketing, Inc. and Gary Witty d/b/a J&W Movers

Case Number: CJ-1999-3336

Judge: P. Thomas Thornbrugh

Court: Tulsa County District Court

Plaintiff's Attorney: James E. Cinocca of McCormick, Field & Cinocca, P.L.L.C., Tulsa

Defendant's Attorney: Thomas M. Askew of Pray, Walker, Jackman, Williamson & Marlar (Vest and Ambassador), Tulsa Pro se (Witty)

Description: Fraud/Conversion/Negligence - Plaintiff, a woman in her late 50s, was employed by Ambassador Home Marketing to live in a house that was on the market until it was sold. Shawna Vest, the president of Ambassador Home Marketing, places people in houses for sale for realtors to improve the curb appeal and help sell the house quicker. During her stay, Plaintiff learned she had stage IV non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She traveled to Texas for treatment and was gone on and off for a two-month period for two to three weeks at a time. While she was gone, some of her relatives moved into the house. When she returned, her belongings had been moved out and the locks on the house had been changed. Plaintiff alleged some of her property, including her china, silver and crystal, were missing. Shawna Vest and Gary Witty denied all allegations. Defendants claimed the relatives that moved in were “squatters” and had trashed the place. Witty claimed he moved Ms. Rose’s belongings out but had delivered them all. Plaintiff claimed $35,000 in domestic property and $10,000 interest for the time her property was missing.

Outcome: The jury found the Defendants acted together to convert the Plaintiff’s property and to defraud her. It also found the Defendants acted recklessly and with malice

Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to verdicts@morelaw.com.



 
Home | Add Verdict | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Articles
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2009 MoreLaw.com, Inc.
MoreLaw Marketing
MoreLaw Marketing
Free Marketing

For Lawyers, Forensic Experts, Court Reporters and Other Businesses
Advertise on this site