M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Recent Additions
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
National Links
International Pages
Information
MoreLaw Marketing
Contact MoreLaw


Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 03-09-2001

Case Style: Phillip Lieberman and Melissa Lieberman v. Schnoover, et al.

Case Number: CJ 2000-00930

Judge: Jane P. Wiseman

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Steve Peters and Eric Stahl of Harris, Gordon, McMahan, Peters & Thompson, P.C., Tulsa, Oklahoma

Defendant's Attorney: Ira Edwards of Pray Walker Jackman Williamson & Marlar, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Description: Phillip Lieberman and Melissa Lieberman,now Jackson (brother & sister) brought this action against three corporations (Cellxion) for breach of employment contracts and against Steven Schoonover and Schoonover Investments L.P. (a family limited partnership which owns the "Cellxion" entities), for breach of a stock "Exchange Agreement" and for fraudulent inducement to enter into the "Exchange Agreement". The case was tried on all Plaintiffs' issues except breach of the "Exchange Agreement", which had been reduced to a Letter of Intent.

Defendants Cellxion countersued both Plaintiffs for breach of employment agreements and conversion of monies and personal property.

There is a long sorted background leading up to the disputed transactions, but in essence, the Plaintiffs were the majority shareholders of Mobile International Inc. that was started by their grandfather in 1970. Mobile manufactured lightweight portable mobile telecommunication and cell communication units. Through a series of tragic events Mobile found itself in a serious cashflow shortage. After options were considered they decided to accept Schoonover's offer to "discharge" the minority shareholders, purchase the secured debt from Mobile's bank and guarantee the Plaintiffs employment agreements and a stock agreement that would provide a minimum 1 million dollar buyout. Mobile would surrender its assets to Cellxion, the unsecured creditors would be paid a pro-rata portion of their accounts based on a fair market value determination of the assets surrendered (less the bank debt), and the business would continue pretty much as before. Cellxion was involved in the same industry, but manufactured different heavier products.

The minority shareholders were sent on their way and the bank notes were purchased. The employment agreements and exchange agreement were to be signed at the bank closing. Pray Walker was local counsel for Cellxion and Schoonover and did not produce the employment or exchange agreements at closing. The bank notes were purchased, however Mobile did not surrender its assets. Schoonover's reaction was intense.. A bill of sale for the assets was "tendered" the next day but delivery was not effective until the employment agreements, and now, letter of intent for an exchange agreement were delivered.

Employment agreements and Letter of Intent were signed about a month later, but the relationships had soured. Cellxion fired the Plaintiffs on four months later under the pretense of "cause" and the Exchange agreement never materialized.

Outcome: The jury found that the Cellxion Defendants breached the employment agreements because they were fired without "Cause", as defined by the agreements which Pray Walker drafted, and that the Plaintiffs had not breached the agreements.

They also found that the Plaintiffs were fraudulently induced by the Schoonover Defendants into entering into the Letter of Intent, and that the fraud warranted stage two punitive damages for wanton and reckless disregard for the Plaintiffs' rights with knowledge of the likely harm to the Plaintiffs.

Finally, the jury found in favor of the Plaintiffs on Defendants' counterclaims for conversion of monies and property (the pretense of "cause" under the employment agreements).

Damages were awarded as follows:

1. Plaintiff Phillip Lieberman (against Cellxion) - Breach of Employment Contract $255,896.58
2. Plaintiff Melissa Lieberman (against Cellxion) - Breach of Employment Contract $105,765.00
3. Plaintiff Phillip Lieberman (against Schoonover)- Fraudulent Inducement $500,000.00
4. Plaintiff Phillip Lieberman (against Schoonover)- Punitive Damages 2x actual $1,000,000.00
5. Plaintiff Melissa Lieberman (against Schoonover)- Fraudulent Inducement $500,000.00
6. Plaintif Melissa Lieberman (against Schoonover)- Punitive Damages 2x actual $1,000,000.00
_____________
TOTAL $3,361,661.58

Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to verdicts@morelaw.com.



 
Home | Add Verdict | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Articles
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2009 MoreLaw.com, Inc.
MoreLaw Marketing
MoreLaw Marketing
Free Marketing

For Lawyers, Forensic Experts, Court Reporters and Other Businesses
Advertise on this site