Date: 03-30-2001

Case Style: Genosky v. Minnesota

Case Number: 99-4277

Judge: McMillian

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Plaintiff's Attorney: Pamel A. Miller and William J. Mavity, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Defendant's Attorney: Greg M. Corwin, St. Louis, Missouri for Defendants Hodapp and Fraser.

Timothy D. Webb, St. Paul, Minnesota for Defendants Chabries, Davis, Minnesota State Patrol and Department of Public Safety

Description: Doreen Genosky ("Genosky") appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota,1 granting summary judgment in favor of the State of Minnesota, Lori Hodapp ("Hodapp"), and Thomas Fraser ("Fraser") (collectively "defendants") on her claims of gender-based discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.; violation of equal protection rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment; conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1985; and tortious interference with contract. Genosky v. State of Minnesota, No. 99-4277 (D. Minn. Sept. 27, 1999) (memorandum opinion and order) (hereinafter "slip op."). For reversal, Genosky argues that the district court erred in holding that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on each of her claims.

* * *

Click the case caption above for the full text of the Court's opinion.

Outcome: Affirmed.

Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: None