Case Style: Munchkin, Inc. v. Playtex Products, LLC
Case Number: 2:11-cv-00503-AHM -RZ
Judge: A. Howard Matz
Court: United State District Court for the Central District of California
Plaintiff's Attorney: Cameron Garrison, David R. Barnard, Travis W. McCallon, >Lathrop & Gage, L.L.P., Kansas City, Missouri and Jeffrey A. Grant and John Shaeffer, Lathrop & Gage, L.L.P., Los Angeles, California; Petty W. Tsay, Munchkin, Inc., North Hills, California
Defendant's Attorney: Nancy J Felsten, Lacy H Koonce, III, Marcia B Paul, Joanna Summerscales and Yonatan Berkovits, Davis Wright Tremaine, L.L.P., New York, New York and Carla A Veltman, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Los Angeles, California
Description: Lathrop & Gage LLP today announced that it won a significant jury verdict on behalf of its client, baby products maker Munchkin Inc., in a false advertising dispute with Playtex Products LLC over false and misleading claims that Playtex made regarding the odor-concealing effectiveness of its Diaper Genie Elite diaper pails.
In what has been called a David versus Goliath case, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled in favor of Los Angeles-based Munchkin, awarding the company $13.492 million in damages. The jury found that Playtex's advertising of its Diaper Genie Elite as "Proven #1 In Odor Control" was literally false, and that Playtex deliberately sought to deceive consumers. The jury further found that Playtex's false advertising had deceived a "substantial number of consumers," and that its statements had likely affected consumers' purchasing decisions. In addition, the jury ruled that Playtex had intentionally sought to deceive consumers in advertising that its Pink Pail diaper pail was "#1 Recommended Among 1st Time Moms."
The jury also issued a defense verdict in favor of Munchkin on all of Playtex's counterclaims, finding that Munchkin's advertising claims stating its ARM & HAMMER(TM) Diaper Pail by Munchkin is "The New #1 in Odor Control--Proven Better at Odor Control than Diaper Genie II and Diaper Genie II Elite in a Laboratory Test" and "Preferred by Moms 2 to 1 over Diaper Genie II in an independent, national in-home study with 100 moms" were neither false nor misleading.
"Playtex deliberately and continuously deceived consumers by making false and misleading claims about the superiority of its products, even though its own internal testing failed to support such claims," said R. Cameron Garrison, a partner with Lathrop & Gage and co-lead counsel to Munchkin in the case. "We are gratified the jury found that notwithstanding Playtex's size and the large sums of money it devotes to advertising its products, it must still compete fairly in the market."
Outcome: Plaintiff's verdict for $13.492 million.