|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com. Date: 11-14-2006 Case Style: Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino v. Rima Fine Art, Jean-Emmanuel Renoir, Dror Darel and Tracy Penwell Case Number: 2:03-cv-01310-MHM Judge: Mary Murguia Court: United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Pima County Plaintiff's Attorney: Phil Scott Flemming of Yen Pilch Komadina & Flemming PC, Phoenix, Arizona; and Richard Morris and Artemio Reategui of Morris Law Firm, PLLC, Surprise, Arizona Defendant's Attorney: Ray Kendall Harris, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, Arizona; Gregory C. Kane and Gregory P Konoske of Shifflet Kane & Konoske, LLP, San Diego, California; Joshua J. Kaufman of Venable Baetjer Howard & Civiletti LLP, Washington, D.C.; David Paul Steiner and Stephen F Ross of David Steiner & Associates PLC, Los Angeles, California; and Phil Flemming of Yen & Pilch PLC, Phoenix, Arizona Description: Societe Civile Succession Richard Guino sued Rima Fine Art, Jean-Emmanuel Renoir, Dror Darel and Tracy Penwell on a copyright violation theory for wrongfully reproducing a collection of sculptures created by artists Pierre-Auguste Renoir and Richard Guino. Plaintiff alleged that the defendants acted intentionally in violating the copyrights and damages of $1.5 million. The defenses asserted by defendants are not available. Outcome: Plaintiff's verdict against Dror Darel and Tracy Penwell for $50,000 violating 10 copyrights and against Jean-Emmanuel for $75,000 for violating the same copyrights. Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown Defendant's Experts: Unknown Comments: None |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|