M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Recent Additions
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
National Links
International Pages
Information
MoreLaw Marketing
Contact MoreLaw


Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 06-26-2001

Case Style: GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.

Case Number: 2001 OK 53

Judge: Summers

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Cheryl Hunter and Jon Epstein of Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, Oklahoma City & Tulsa, Oklahoma

Defendant's Attorney: George D. Sherrill, Jr., of DeBois, Sherrill & Reynolds, Duncan, Oklahoma

Description: The District Court of Oklahoma County, the Honorable Niles Jackson, vacated an arbitration award. That order was reversed in part and affirmed in part by the Court of Civil Appeals. After certiorari had been denied and prior to issuance of the mandate both parties claimed prevailing party status and sought appeal-related attorney’s fees. We deny the requests for an unconditional award of fees because no party is a prevailing party on the cause of action at this stage of the litigation. However, we hold that either party may seek appeal-related attorney’s fees conditioned upon that party making a timely showing in the trial court that the party has satisfied the requirements of statute or contract for the appeal and certiorari-related attorney’s fees requested.

* * *

Click the case caption above for the full text of the Court's opinion.

Outcome: The District Court of Oklahoma County, the Honorable Niles Jackson, vacated an arbitration award. That order was reversed in part and affirmed in part by the Court of Civil Appeals. After certiorari had been denied and prior to issuance of the mandate both parties claimed prevailing party status and sought appeal-related attorney’s fees. We deny the requests for an unconditional award of fees because no party is a prevailing party on the cause of action at this stage of the litigation. However, we hold that either party may seek appeal-related attorney’s fees conditioned upon that party making a timely showing in the trial court that the party has satisfied the requirements of statute or contract for the appeal and certiorari-related attorney’s fees requested.

Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: None



 
Home | Add Verdict | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Articles
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2009 MoreLaw.com, Inc.
MoreLaw Marketing
MoreLaw Marketing
Free Marketing

For Lawyers, Forensic Experts, Court Reporters and Other Businesses
Advertise on this site