Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto
Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
STATE OF KANSAS v. ROBERT H. LACKEY II
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
Case Number: 116,125
Judge: PER CURIAM
Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
Plaintiff's Attorney: Ellen Mitchell, county attorney
Description: Robert H. Lackey II appeals the district court's dismissal of his petition for DNA testing after the testing was completed and the uncontested results were unfavorable to Lackey. The testing failed to produce any noncumulative, exculpatory evidence relevant to Lackey's claim, and the district court dismissed the motion as required by statute. See K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-2512(f)(1)(A) (the court "[s]hall dismiss the petition" if the results of DNA testing are unfavorable to the petitioner).
Outcome: We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude the district court adequately addressed the issues and reached the correct conclusion. The lab report issued by Genetic Technologies shows DNA testing results which are unfavorable to Lackey and do not produce any noncumulative, exculpatory evidence relevant to his claim. Some items were retested, and the new test results are consistent with the prior findings. Some items were tested for the first time, and the results either obtained no genetic profile or obtained a partial genetic profile that was rendered unsuitable for both statistical evaluation and inclusionary statements. The district court's dismissal is affirmed under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.042(b)(2) (2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 48) (the appeal is without merit).