|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com. Date: 03-26-2009 Case Style: Parkham Industrial Distributors, Inc. dba Onsite Waste Management v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company Case Number: 08-5453 Judge: Alice M. Batchelder Court: United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on appeal from the Western District of Kentucky, McCracken County Plaintiff's Attorney: Defendant's Attorney: Description: Parkham Industrial Distributors, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to The Cincinnati Insurance Co., Inc. (“CIC”) on Parkham’s claims that CIC breached the terms of its insurance contract and showed bad faith in refusing to defend and indemnify Parkham against a lawsuit brought by Solidification Products International, Inc. (“SPI”). The district court held that the fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation claims in SPI’s First Amended Complaint did not allege an “advertising injury” covered by Parkham’s policy with CIC, and that, even if they did, those claims arose out of a patent infringement claim and were excluded from coverage. Having granted summary judgment to CIC on the breach-of-contract claim, the district court subsequently dismissed with prejudice Parkham’s claims of bad faith. Outcome: Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to CIC and dismissing Parkham’s Complaint. Plaintiff's Experts: Defendant's Experts: Comments: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|