Kafir Deshawn Kabbara, Jr.

MoreLaw Suites - Legal Suites and Virtual Offices

The Best Places In Downtown Tulsa To Practice Law

406 South Boulder and 625 South Denver - 582-3993

Case Number: 05-15-01440-CR

Judge: David Schenck

Court: In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Lori Ordiway  
Faith Johnson  
Christine Ou

Defendant's Attorney:

Niles Illich

Description: Zackery Louis Williamson waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a
deadly weapon. After finding appellant guilty, the trial court sentenced him to ten years in
prison. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing no arguable
grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]
1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to
file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,
319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders
cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.

Outcome: