Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-24-2014

Case Style: Kiara King v . Sttegast Heights Village

Case Number: 01-12-01154-CV

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: Texas Court of Appeals, First District on appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Mark J. Grandich

Defendant's Attorney: Patrick Glen Drake

Description: In this forcible-detainer action, appellant, Kiara King, challenges the trial court’s judgment awarding possession of a leased premises to appellee, Settegast Heights Village (“SHV”). King has filed a motion to vacate the trial court’s
judgment and dismiss the appeal, asserting that the only issue on appeal—current actual possession of the leased premises—is moot. See Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006) (holding that when appellant presented no basis for claiming right to possession, there was no live controversy between the parties and issue of possession was moot). SHV has filed a response, contending that vacating the trial court’s judgment is improper.

Although King asserts that she has since vacated the leased premises, we do not have a record that supports her assertion.

Outcome: Accordingly, we grant King’s motion in part and dismiss the appeal. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: