Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 11-05-2014

Case Style: United States of America v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Case Number:

Judge: Richard Seeborg

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Francisco County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Steven J. Saltiel

Defendant's Attorney: Bob Goldman

Description: SAN FRANCISCO, CA – Agilent Technologies, Inc. has agreed to pay the government $849,678 to resolve allegations that it submitted false claims to the United States in connection with the sale of electronic measurement instruments, United States Attorney Melinda Haag and Defense Criminal Investigative Service Special Agent in Charge Chris Hendrickson announced today.

In March 2013, Agilent made a voluntary disclosure to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense that certain sales of electronic measurement instruments and systems to the government were the result of improper coordination of pricing and bid strategy between Agilent and its distributors and resellers. During the government’s subsequent investigation, Agilent provided information and materials showing that it entered into agreements with its partners on whether to bid, and what prices to bid, often for the purpose of meeting the requirement under procurement rules that the government consider a minimum of three bids. The settlement agreement resolves the government’s investigation, in which Agilent fully cooperated.

“This settlement demonstrates our continuing commitment to ensure the integrity of the government procurement system. We commend Agilent for its prompt disclosure of improper price coordination, and subsequent cooperation in the government’s investigation.”

The settlement with Agilent was the result of a coordinated effort among the United States Attorney’s Office, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Contract Audit Agency, and the General Services Administration, Office of Inspector General.

Outcome: See above

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: