<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Hospital Law - MoreLaw.com</title>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com</link>
<description>Hospital Law - MoreLaw.com</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>&#169; Copyright 2008, MoreLaw.com Inc All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
<category>Recent Cases</category>
<item>
<title>Robin L. Pepper v. Routh Crabtree, P.C., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=S-13042&amp;s=AK&amp;d=42050</link>
<description>Robin Pepper sued an Anchorage debt collection agency and its lawyers, claiming that they violated Alaskas Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (UTPA) when they: (1) sued Pepper in state district court without first sending a written demand, (2) misrepresented to the court that Pepper was competent, and (3) applied for default judgment without first informing Peppers attorney. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berry &amp; Murphy, P.C. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-1004&amp;s=CO&amp;d=42034</link>
<description>Plaintiffs-Appellants Berry &amp; Murphy, P.C. and Timothy H. Berry, P.C. (plaintiffs) appeal the district courts grant of summary judgment to Defendant- Appellee Carolina Casualty Insurance Company (Carolina Casualty) on plaintiffs claim for insurance coverage for a malpractice lawsuit. Plaintiffs filed their action in state court and Carolina Casualty removed the case to federal co</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Patricia Fierle v. Jorge Perez, M.D., Ltd., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=125%20Nev.%20Adv.%20Op.%20No.%2054&amp;s=NV&amp;d=42044</link>
<description>Appellants Patricia Fierle and her husband, Daniel Fierle, filed a complaint against Dr. Jorge Perez, members of his staff, and his professional medical corporation.  The complaint stemmed from an incident where Patricia suffered severe burns from chemotherapy treatment that Dr. Perezs staff administered.  After initially failing to attach an expert affidavit to the complaint, the Fierles then </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Deana Dowell, et al. v. Biosense Webster, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B201439&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42041</link>
<description>Plaintiffs and Appellants St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. (SC) and Pacesetter, Inc. (Pacesetter) (collectively, St. Jude), along with employees Deana Dowell, Steven Chapman and Claudio Plaza, sued Defendant and Cross-appellant Biosense Webster, Inc. (Biosense) to enjoin it from enforcing noncompete and nonsolicitation clauses in employment agreements used in California, including agreements it had wit</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Martin Kelley v. CB&amp;I Constructors, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B205735&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42040</link>
<description>A jury found that defendant CB&amp;I Constructors, Inc. (defendant) negligently sparked a brush fire that caused significant damage to a ranch (the property) owned by plaintiff Martin Kelly (plaintiff). Because plaintiff had a personal reason to restore the property, the jury awarded plaintiff substantially more in damages to restore the property than the property was worth immediately before the fire</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marvin W. Couch, II, M.D. v. Board of Trustees of the Memorial Hospital of Carbon County, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-8001&amp;s=WY&amp;d=42033</link>
<description>Dr. Marvin Wayne Couch appeals from summary judgment entered in favorof defendants, Memorial Hospital of Carbon County (MHCC), a small ruralhospital where he has staff privileges, the hospitals chief administrator, and sixof the ten other physicians who have privileges at MHCC. Dr. Couch brought thisaction, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.  1983, to remedy an alleged deprivation of his FirstA</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saint Louis University and Paulo Bicalho, M.D. v. Alice Geary</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC89840&amp;s=MO&amp;d=42022</link>
<description>Saint Louis University (SLU) and Paulo Bicalho, M.D., appeal the judgment in favor of Phillip Sgroi and his wife, Alice Geary, in a medical negligence action. A jury found Dr. Bicalho negligent for failing to timely diagnose and treat Mr. Sgrois fractured hip and found SLU, Dr. Bicalhos employer, vicariously liable for his negligence. SLU and Dr. Bicalho present three issues on appeal:</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frederick Beaty v. St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, Desmond J. Young, M.D., Cardiovascular Consul</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=WD69441&amp;s=MO&amp;d=42019</link>
<description>Following a jury verdict, Frederick and Barbara Beaty appeal a judgment denying their medical negligence claims against the defendants, St. Lukes Hospital of Kansas City, Dr. Desmond Young, Cardiovascular Consultants, P.A., and Dr. Martin Zink III. The Beatys contend the circuit court abused its discretion in: (1) allowing a treating physician to testify as a defense expert after the physician </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arthur C. Wagner, Jr. v. Live Nation Motor Sports</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-3365%20&%2007-3366&amp;s=KS&amp;d=42031</link>
<description>In this diversity case governed by Kansas tort law, SFX Motor Sports, Inc.1 (SFX), appeals the district courts denial of its post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). SFX argues that a reasonable jury could not have found SFX liable for wanton conduct based on its staging of an August 2003 motorcycle race in which Arthur Wagner, Jr. (Wagner), crashed and was se</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beulah Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC d/b/a FutureCare Lochearn</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=No.%20134%20September%20Term,%202008&amp;s=MD&amp;d=41989</link>
<description>In this case, we must address whether Section 12-303(3)(ix) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, Maryland Code (1974, 2006 Repl. Vol.),1 permits an appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration, in a case in which the circuit court judge also expressly denied a motion to certify the denial as a final judgment. We will answer that question in the negative, shall vacate the ju</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doris Penrod v. David R. Schecter, M.D., Individually and d/b/a Schecter and Blumenfeld, P.A.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-07-00121-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=41980</link>
<description> Is it reversible error to permit a jury to decide a case based on an instruction that is neither supported by the evidence, intended by the trial court, nor properly defined? Because we conclude that it is, we reverse and remand.FACTUAL SUMMARYDoris Penrod appeals from a take nothing judgment entered in favor of David R. Schecter, M.D., Individually, and d/b/a Schecter and Blumenfeld, P.A., follo</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Edwin Hardt v. Vitae Foundation, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=WD70525&amp;s=MO&amp;d=42023</link>
<description>Edwin Hardt and Karl Hardt (the Hardts) appeal from the circuit courts judgment dismissing for lack of standing their petition to enforce their charitable gift and the conditions thereon to the Vitae Foundation, Inc.  (Vitae). We affirm.Factual and Procedural BackgroundAppellants Edwin Hardt and Karl Hardt are executors of the estate of Selma J. Hartke. Pursuant to Ms. Hartkes wi</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tammy King v. Barbara Johnson</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=D054136&amp;s=CA&amp;d=41958</link>
<description>Plaintiff Tammy King appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Barbara Johnston. Tammy,1 a beneficiary of the Arthur L. Gilbert Testamentary Trust, sued Barbara in a civil action, alleging that Barbara had unduly influenced the trustee, Lenora Gilbert, to breach the trust.2 According to Tammy, Barbara induced Lenora to transfer a piece of trust property to herself, without consideratio</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George Louie v. BFS Retail and Commercial Operations, L.L.C.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=C059800&amp;s=CA&amp;d=41957</link>
<description>Plaintiff George Louie seeks damages against defendant BFS Retail and Commercial Operations, LLC (BFRC) for alleged violation of Californias Disabled Persons Act (Civ. Code,  54 et seq.1 (DPA)), because the countertops in BFRCs business establishments were allegedly too high to allow wheelchair access. The trial court entered judgment of dismissal upon BFRCs demurrer, concluding res jud</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ghassan Saleh v. Ribeiro Trucking, LLC, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=AC%2029825&amp;s=CT&amp;d=41940</link>
<description>The plaintiff, Ghassan Saleh, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, which set aside the jury verdict and ordered a new trial on the issue of damages after he refused to accept a court-ordered remittitur. The plaintiffs sole claim on appeal is that the court improperly ordered the remittitur in the absence of any reason to determine that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Family and Estate of Velibor Videnovic v. Dr. Jack Goodman and Dr. William Teubl</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=&amp;s=&amp;d=41918</link>
<description>The Family and Estate of Velibor Videnovic sued Drs. Jack Goodman and William Teubl on medical negligence theories for the wrongful death of Mr. Videnovic on November 19, 2003 from a stroke.  Videnvoic presented at the Northern Dutchess Hospital on October 3, 2003 after having experienced unexplained shaking of his left leg and arm for about five second.  Subsequent testing revealed that he had pa</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michael H. Kellermann v. Paul McDonough</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=081718&amp;s=VA&amp;d=41952</link>
<description>The primary question that we consider in this appeal is whether adults who agree to supervise and care for a child owe a duty to exercise reasonable care in the supervision and care of that child.II.Michael H. Kellermann, administrator of the estate of his daughter, Jaimee Elizabeth Kellermann, filed a wrongful death action against Paul McDonough and Paula McDonough (the McDonoughs). Kellermann al</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Samuel Eugene Rhoads v. Matthew Miller</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-8093&amp;s=Wy&amp;d=41927</link>
<description>Matthew Miller appeals from the district courts order denying him qualified immunity against Samuel Rhoads 42 U.S.C.  1983 claim that Deputy Miller subjected him to excessive force while booking him into the Big Horn County Jail. We affirm.BackgroundOn December 1, 2005, Deputy Ben Mayland responded to a complaint that a drunken man in a wheelchair  Mr. Rhoads  was threatening bar pat</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jeremy Antley v. Dr. Faye Armstrong-Papp and Northwest Medical Center</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=&amp;s=AR&amp;d=41897</link>
<description>Jeremy Antley sued Dr. Faye Armstrong-Papp on a medical negligence (medical malpractice) theory claiming that Defendant acted below the standard of care in providing post-operative case to him after his appendix burst during an appendectomy performed tat Northwest Arkansas Medical Center on August 19, 2007.  Plaintiff presented at the hospital in pain and was correctly diagnosed as having an infla</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Janeen Miller v. Kristen Nichols</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-1174&amp;s=ME&amp;d=41931</link>
<description>Plaintiffs are the parents of a child removed from them by the state after extensive proceedings resulted in a finding that the best interests of the child required termination of their parental rights. In re G.M., No. PC-05-75 (Me. D. Ct. Jan. 23, 2008). The parents then sued in federal court, asserting violations of statutory and constitutional rights during the termination proceedings and parti</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Cheryl R. Neal v. Peter D. Brophry, by his guardian and conservator, Ka</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=S-08-0271,%20S-08-0272&amp;s=WY&amp;d=41893</link>
<description>[1] A jury awarded Peter and Kate Brophy damages in the amount of $18,069,257 for injuries they sustained as a result of a collision between Mr. Brophys vehicle and a semitruck owned by Werner Enterprises, Inc. (Werner) and being driven by Werner employee, Cheryl R. Neal. The district court entered judgment on the verdict and Werner appealed. The Brophys filed a cross-appeal.[2] In their </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hans-Gerd Rasenack v. AIG Life Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-1521&amp;s=&amp;d=41924</link>
<description>This action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.  1001 et seq. Hans-Gerd Rasenack seeks accidental paralysis and rehabilitation benefits from AIG Life Insurance Company, the insurer, and AIG Claim Services, the plan administrator (collectively, AIG). The district court reviewed the administrators denial of benefits under an arbitrary and capricious</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kenneth Eugene Barrett v. Johnny Philpot, Sheriff of Sequoyah county, Oklahoma</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-7008&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41923</link>
<description>Kenneth Eugene Barrett, a federal prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the district courts entry of judgment in favor of defendants in his civil rights suit filed under 42 U.S.C.  1983. We reverse and remand with respect to defendants Gary Philpot and Michael Hendricks. In all other respects, we affirm.I.Mr. Barrett was arrested at his residence in the early morning h</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jebaco, Inc. v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-30289&amp;s=LA&amp;d=41844</link>
<description>Jebaco Inc. appeals the dismissal of its federal antitrust claims against Pinnacle Entertainment and Harrahs Operating Company, Inc., along with five Harrahs subsidiaries (Harrahs). The district court dismissed the claims 1 under Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 12(c) as barred by the state action doctrine and Noerr- Pennington petitioning immunity. We affirm on the alternate ground, fully brie</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mary Kathryn Brown v. City of Pittsburgh</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-1819&amp;s=PA&amp;d=41934</link>
<description>This case requires us to delineate, in a quite literal sense, the boundaries of the First Amendments protection of speech. In response to concerns about aggressive protests and confrontations at health care facilities providing abortions, the City of Pittsburgh enacted Ordinance No. 49 in December 2005. Pittsburgh, Pa., Code tit. 6,  623.01623.07. The Ordinance established two different </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>

