<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Compromise and Settlement Law - MoreLaw.com</title>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com</link>
<description>Compromise and Settlement Law - MoreLaw.com</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>&#169; Copyright 2008, MoreLaw.com Inc All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
<category>Recent Cases</category>
<item>
<title>Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc.; Documedics Acquisition Co., Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-35619&amp;s=WA&amp;d=42027</link>
<description>The False Claims Act (FCA) was designed to encourage reporting of false or fraudulent claims that are submitted to the federal government for approval or payment. Typically a relatora whistle-blowing employee, a business partner or competitorbrings suit for the benefit of the United States. Mortgages, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 934 F.2d 209, 210 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam). The gov</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>James W. Powell, Jr. v. City of Newton</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=COA08-1262&amp;s=NC&amp;d=41813</link>
<description>James W. Powell, Jr. (plaintiff) appeals the 27 May 2008 order requiring him to execute a settlement agreement and quitclaim deed. Defendant City of Newton (the city), third-party defendant Shaver Wood Products, Inc. (Shaver), and third-party defendant W.K. Dickson Engineering, Inc. (Dickson) (collectively defendants) appeal the 19 August 2008 order denying their moti</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dodge City Implement, Inc., et al. v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Barber, et </title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=96,784%20&amp;s=KS&amp;d=40089</link>
<description>This case arises out of a collision between a Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Freight (BNSF) train and a truck owned by Dodge City Implement, Inc. (DCI). BNSF filed suit in federal court against DCI and its employee driver, Justin Slattery. After that action was settled, plaintiffs DCI and Slattery pursued this suit against defendants Barber County (County) and Moore Township (Township) under neg</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Capital Credit &amp; Collection Services, Inc. v. Fariba T. Armani fka Fariba T. Robinson</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A133535&amp;s=OR&amp;d=40013</link>
<description>Plaintiff Capital Credit &amp; Collection Services, Inc., a debt collector, brought this action to collect $3,990.57 in principal, interest, and attorney fees on a guaranty of a student loan that defendant signed for a friend, Armani. (1)  Plaintiff alleged that it had been assigned a claim for the principal of the loan by the creditor, United States National Bank (US Bank).  Defendant's amended answe</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hyundai Motor America v. Angela R. Alley</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=No.%201495%20September%20Term,%202007&amp;s=MD&amp;d=38380</link>
<description>Appellant, Hyundai Motor America, is appealing a decision by the Circuit Court for Cecil County awarding attorneys fees to appellee, Angela Alley, under the fee shifting provisions of the Maryland Automotive Warranty Enforcement Act, the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. The fees were awarded after the parties negotiated a settlement of the case, and </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>McDonwell Welding &amp; Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Company, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC%20S054626&amp;s=OR&amp;d=37317</link>
<description>Plaintiff brought this action, alleging that defendants had failed to pay for work that plaintiff had done on a construction project.  Defendants denied that allegation and alleged, as an affirmative defense, that plaintiff had agreed to release its claims against defendants in return for defendants' paying plaintiff $896,000.  Defendants also counterclaimed for specific performance of that settle</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Theresa D. Messer v. Huntington Anesthesia Group, Inc., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=33663&amp;s=WV&amp;d=36788</link>
<description>      This case is before us on appeal for a second time. In the first appeal (hereinafter Messer I), (See footnote 1) we reversed the dismissal by the lower court of Theresa D. Messer's discrimination suit based on handicap. Ms. Messer (hereinafter Appellant) now appeals from the January 11, 2007, order of the Circuit Court of Cabell County granting summary judgment to the defendants </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mary Ryan, et al. v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Providence, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2004-49-Appeal.&amp;s=RI&amp;d=35432</link>
<description>The plaintiffs, Mary Ryan and Thomas Ryan, appealto this Court from the motion justice's1 entry of judgment, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the SuperiorCourt Rules of Civil Procedure, in favor of the following defendants: Most Reverend Louis E.Gelineau, Most Reverend Daniel P. Reilly, Most Reverend Kenneth A. Angell, the RomanCatholic Bishop of Providence (a corporation sole), and Saint Thomas </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adrian Baker v. Federal Express Corporation</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=01-05-01160-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=32173</link>
<description>         Adrian Baker settled his negligence claim against Federal Express Corporation ("Fed Ex") during trial, before the court submitted the case to the jury.  After Baker nonsuited the case, the trial court held a hearing on his previously filed sanctions motion and imposed a $1,000 sanction against Fed Ex for spoliation of evidence.  Baker appeals, contending that (1) the trial court erred in </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joshua Josephs v. Pacific Bell Telephone</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=03-56412&amp;s=CA&amp;d=30946</link>
<description>In this appeal we must resolve issues arising from theemployment discrimination action brought against PacificBell Telephone Company (PacBell) by a former service technician,Joshua Liam Josephs. After the jury rendered a verdictfor Josephs on his claim alleging that PacBell's decision todeny him reinstatement violated the Americans with DisabilitiesAct of 1990, 42 U.S.C.  12101 et. se</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MARIO BADILLO v.MID CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2004%20OK%2042&amp;s=OK&amp;d=28734</link>
<description>1 The dispositive issue is whether under the uncontested facts, the trial court should have found as a matter of law that the liability insurer did not violate its duty of good faith and fair dealing to its insured. We hold that the uncontested facts do not support a breach of the duty and therefore the trial court should have granted the appellants' motion for a directed verdict.I. FACTS2</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mir Kazem Kashani, et al. v. Tsann Kuen China Enterprise Co., Ltd., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B166041&amp;s=CA&amp;d=28038</link>
<description>Plaintiffs Mir Kazem Kashani, Manoutcher G. Nikfarjam, and ShantiaHassanshahi (collectively plaintiffs) allege in their second amended complaint that theyand defendant Tsann Kuen China Enterprise Co., Ltd., a Chinese corporation that is theparent corporation or owner of the other named defendants (collectively defendants),executed a written agreement whereby plaintiffs would establish an</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In re: Bankruptcy of Mark Nutritionals Inc. of San Antonio</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=02-54469&amp;s=TX&amp;d=27278</link>
<description>On the 27th day of January, 2004, came on to be considered the "Joint Motion of the Stateof Texas and the Chapter 7 Trustee For Approval of Compromise and Settlement" (Docket No.409, "the Motion").1. The Court notes that an Objection to the proposed settlement was filed by counsel for theConsumer Class Action (Docket No. 432), but has been resolved and withdrawn by agreement.2. Having he</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Acceptance Ins. Co.and Robert F. Swartzbaugh. </title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A-02-207&amp;s=NE&amp;d=27155</link>
<description>This action commenced with a petition of interpleader filed by the First National Bank of Omaha (FNB) asking the court to determine the ownership of approximately 20,396 shares of Acceptance Insurance Companies, Inc. (Acceptance), common stock which FNB was holding in escrow under agreements between Acceptance, Robert F. Swartzbaugh, and others. The litigated issues were between Acceptance and Swa</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc., and Sierra American Corporation v. Dodson International Parts, Inc.; Ho</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=WD61655,%20WD61800%20,%20WD62141&amp;s=MO&amp;d=27109</link>
<description>This appeal stems from complex commercial litigation involving an airplane that made an emergency landing near Kansas City's Downtown Airport. The parties to this appeal include the airplane's owner/operator; the company that insured the airplane; and the company that hauled the airplane after the landing. The plane's owner/operator sued the insurance company and the hauler to recover damages purp</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abdiwali Abdi Musse and Allstate Insurance Co. v. Arnulfo Garcia</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=88,723&amp;s=KS&amp;d=24817</link>
<description>Allstate Indemnity Company intervened in its insured's third-party litigation against a tortfeasor to protect its lien for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits that had been paid. Ultimately, the third-party litigation was settled, and the district court awarded the insured's attorney 25% of the PIP subrogation recovery as attorney fees. Allstate appeals, contending the law does not provide f</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2003 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Borough of Haledon v. Borough of North Haledon, et al</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=a3196-01&amp;s=NJ&amp;d=24261</link>
<description>Plaintiff Borough of Haledon appeals from summary judgment orders entered in favor of the Boroughs of North Haledon and Hawthorne, and certain developers, the intervenors K. Hovnanian North Central Acquisitions, LLC (Hovnanian), and Summit Point Developers, LLC (Summit), requesting enforcement of claimed exclusive water supply rights with North Haledon for three development projects and alleging b</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jason F. Ferguson v. Shane A. "Andy" Smith and State Farm Automobile Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=89,025&amp;s=KS&amp;d=23729</link>
<description>Ferguson, Curtis Brading, and Shane Smith were involved in a single car accident in a vehicle owned by Smith's parents. State Farm was the liability carrier on the Smith car. Fifteen-year-old Ferguson, who claimed to have no memory of the accident, sustained injuries as a result of it. Smith and Brading informed police that Smith had been driving the vehicle. Smith also told State Farm claims spec</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kristin Wilkinson, Appellant V. Jamie Cidzik and Jerry Cidzik, Appellees</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=14-02-00776-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=23305</link>
<description>This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 4, 2002.February 11, 2003, the parties filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal in order to effectuate a compromise and settlement agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  The parties ask that we set aside the judgment of the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 without regard to the merits of the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for r</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harvey Lerer, et al. v. Stephen Lerer</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=05-02-00124-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=21920</link>
<description>Appellants sued Stephen Lerer and Katie Lerer in 1996, alleging Stephen and Katie were liable to appellants under various legal theories for actions taken by Stephen and Katie in handling Joseph Lerer's estate and the trusts created by Joseph's will. The parties submitted the case for mediation and executed the MSA.         The MSA stated more formal settlement documents would be drafted by Step</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mona Electrical Services, Inc., et al. v. Wade O. Shelton</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=No.%2001538,%20September%20Term,%202001&amp;s=MD&amp;d=24345</link>
<description>Section 9-736(b)(3) of the Workers' Compensation Act ("Act")provides that the Workers' Compensation Commission "may not modify an award unless the modification is applied for within five years after the last compensation payment." Md. Code Ann. (1991, 1999 Repl. Vol.),  9-736 of the Lab. &amp; Empl. Article1. The question presented by this appeal is whether the five-year limitations period of that pr</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jerry A. Berardi, et al. v. Meadowbrook Mall Company, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=No.%2030517&amp;s=WV&amp;d=21672</link>
<description>Jerry A. Berardi (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Berardi"), Betty J. Berardi, and Bentley Corporation, plaintiffs below/appellants (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Berardis"), seek reversal of a summary judgment granted to Meadowbrook Mall Company, an Ohio Limited Partnership, and the Cafaro Company (hereinafter referred to as "Cafaro Company"), an Ohio Corporation, defendants below/</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O'Neill v. Gallant Insurance Co.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=5-00-0505&amp;s=IL&amp;d=23860</link>
<description>In this case, an insurance company took its small stake in the outcome of a personal-injury claim, $20,000 worth of liability coverage purchased by one of its customers, and transformed it into a multimillion-dollar judgment against the carrier. For reasons that are not entirely clear, John Moss, executive vice president of Warrior Insurance Group(1), the person primarily responsible for this acti</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>David Riner, et al. v. H. William Newbaugh, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=30087&amp;s=WV&amp;d=18559</link>
<description>Mr. and Mrs. Riner appeal from the March 16, 2001, order of the Circuit Court of Berkeley, denying their motion to alter or amend the judgment entered on February 13, 2001, that pertains to enforcement of a settlement agreement that was reached as a result of a court-ordered mediation. While the Riners signed the Mediation Settlement Agreement, which was prepared by mediator Patrick Henry,   (See </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Apr 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>William R. Bown v. Harold Sparks, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=002794&amp;s=VA&amp;d=18916</link>
<description>In this appeal, William R. Brown seeks reversal of the circuit court's judgment holding that Brown's motion for judgment was precluded by an accord and satisfaction.Brown and Harold Sparks, an employee of Interstate Batteries of Raleigh, N.C., t/a Interstate Battery Systems of Southern Virginia (Interstate), had an altercation on Interstate's business premises.  Brown and Sparks swore </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Nov 2001 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>

