<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Arson Law - MoreLaw.com</title>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com</link>
<description>Arson Law - MoreLaw.com</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>&#169; Copyright 2008, MoreLaw.com Inc All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
<category>Recent Cases</category>
<item>
<title>Melissa Harman v. Brent Polluck</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-4068&amp;s=UT&amp;d=42032</link>
<description>In this ongoing action under 42 U.S.C.  1983, a previous panel of this court determined that various material factual disputes remained regarding the constitutionality of the near two-hour early morning detention of Melissa Harman and Justin Overton (or the Plaintiffs), and the corresponding after-midnight searches of their garage apartment conducted by officers who worked for the Utah Dep</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B200006&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42029</link>
<description>In this products liability lawsuit, plaintiffs Richard Merrill and Tamara Merrill sued defendants Leslie Controls, Inc. (Leslie Controls) and Elliott Company for Richard Merrills injuries caused by exposure to asbestos-containing products. Leslie Controls appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs. We conclude that plaintiffs have not shown that Leslie Controls manufactured, supplied, or distribute</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Unseld Nance, Sr.  v.  Erik Sammis</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-1353&amp;s=&amp;d=42014</link>
<description>This case arises from the fatal shooting of DeAunta Farrow and seizure of Unseld Nance by two police officers in West Memphis, Arkansas. The families of Farrow and Nance brought this action under 42 U.S.C.  1983 and state law against the two officers, as well as the chief of police, the mayor, and the city, alleging in particular excessive force and unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourt</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Roy L. Denton v. Steve Rievley</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-6406&amp;s=TN&amp;d=42009</link>
<description>In this lawsuit alleging violations of 42 U.S.C.  1983, Appellant Steve Rievley, a Dayton City police officer, appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment on claims made by Appellee Roy Denton. Rievley claims that he should have been granted summary judgment on Dentons warrantless arrest claim because he is entitled to qualified immunity. WeAFFIRM.I. BACKGROUNDA. Factual backg</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Debbie Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=10-08-00128-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=41977</link>
<description>In this products-liability action, Appellants Debbie Hunter et al. (the Hunters) appeal a take-nothing judgment, raising three issues.  We will affirm.Background            Bob Hunter was killed in a post-collision fire that occurred after the 1999 Ford F-350 diesel pickup truck he was driving collided nearly head-on with a Toyota pickup truck.  The Toyotas driver was killed instantly.  Bob</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>David Burke v. County of Alameda</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-15658&amp;s=CA&amp;d=41965</link>
<description>This case involves the conflict between the right of families to be free of arbitrary governmental interference and the legitimate role of the state in protecting children from abuse. In 2005, B.F., the fourteen-year old daughter of Melissa Burke and Clifton Farina, ran away from home. One week after she returned, Mark Foster, an Alameda County police officer, met with B.F. to discuss formally the</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Larson &amp; Larson, P.A., et al. v. TSE Industries, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC08-428&amp;s=FL&amp;d=41967</link>
<description>We have for review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in TSE Industries, Inc. v. Larson &amp; Larson, P.A., 987 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), in which the district court certified direct conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Integrated Broadcast Services, Inc. v. Mitchel, 931 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), regarding when the two-year statute of limita</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Samuel Eugene Rhoads v. Matthew Miller</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-8093&amp;s=Wy&amp;d=41927</link>
<description>Matthew Miller appeals from the district courts order denying him qualified immunity against Samuel Rhoads 42 U.S.C.  1983 claim that Deputy Miller subjected him to excessive force while booking him into the Big Horn County Jail. We affirm.BackgroundOn December 1, 2005, Deputy Ben Mayland responded to a complaint that a drunken man in a wheelchair  Mr. Rhoads  was threatening bar pat</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dorothy Chappell v. City of Cleveland</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-4456&amp;s=OH&amp;d=41908</link>
<description>This action arises from the tragic shooting by police officers of a fifteen-year old boy, Brandon McCloud, in his own bedroom. While conducting a protective sweep of a home in the early-morning darkness prior to executing a search warrant, the officers encountered a male suspect hiding in a bedroom closet. When they ordered him to come out and show his hands, the suspect came toward the officers w</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lisa Nicole Bridges v. Brandon Yeager</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-5169&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41925</link>
<description>Plaintiff-Appellant Lisa Nicole Bridges appeals from summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Deputy Brandon Yeager on her civil rights claims. 42 U.S.C.  1983. Ms. Bridges sued the deputy solely in his individual capacity for compensatory and punitive damages claiming that (1) he used excessive force while arresting her, and (2) he falsely arrested her for assault and battery on a police</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Donna Scroggin  v.  Wyeth, and its divisions; Pharmacia &amp; Upjohn Company, L.L.C.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-2555,%2008-2711,%2008-2713&amp;s=AR&amp;d=41885</link>
<description>Donna Scroggin was diagnosed with breast cancer eleven years after she began taking estrogen and progestin drugs manufactured by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Wyeth) and Pharmacia &amp; Upjohn Co. (Upjohn).1 She sued the companies in 2004 for failure to warn of the risk of breast cancer from combination hormone therapy.The trial was bifurcated, with liability determined first and punitive damages determ</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>World Harvest Church, Inc. v. Guideone Mutual Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-17258&amp;s=GA&amp;d=41878</link>
<description>This is an insurance case raising some questions of Georgia law.Without issuing a written reservation of rights, an insurer assumed the defense of a lawsuit for almost eleven months but stopped defending near the end of the discovery period because it decided that there was no coverage. At that point the policy holder hired its own attorneys to defend the lawsuit. About one month after the new att</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amy Thompson v. Salt Lake County</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=06-4304&amp;s=UT&amp;d=41858</link>
<description>Plaintiffs-Appellants Amy Thomson, individually and as guardian ad litem for her two children, and the estate of Chad Thomson, through Ms. Thomson as its personal representative, challenge the district courts grant of summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees Salt Lake County and Deputy Alan Morrical. First, Plaintiffs argue that it was error to grant summary judgment to Deputy Morrical on the </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amy Shirley Oliver v. Lori Fiorino</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-15081&amp;s=FL&amp;d=41880</link>
<description>In this civil rights case, Orlando police officers Lori Fiorino and David Burk appeal from the district courts denial of their motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. Appellee Amy Shirley Oliver, as personal representative of the estate of Anthony Carl Oliver, Sr., alleges that the officers used excessive and unreasonable force in violation of Anthony Olivers Fourth A</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Danny J. Bowling v. Joe Rector, Commissioned Agent of the OklahomaState Bureau of Investigation,</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-6284&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41856</link>
<description>In this interlocutory appeal, Joe Rector challenges the district courts denial of his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Danny Bowling sued Rector and eight other defendants under 42 U.S.C.  1983, alleging that they violated his constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure when Rector applied for and received a warrant to search Bowlings house </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joseph Kamelgard v. Jerzy Macura</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-4254,%2009-1030&amp;s=&amp;d=41914</link>
<description>The plaintiff, a bariatric surgeon who lives and practices in New Jersey, brought this diversity suit in the federal district court in Chicago. He claims to have been defamed by the defendant, another bariatric surgeon, who practices in New York. The district judge dismissed the suit without prejudice, on the ground that venue in Chicago was improper, and the plaintiff appeals. The defendant cross</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Century Indemnity Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-2924&amp;s=&amp;d=41770</link>
<description>This matter comes on before this Court on an appeal byappellant Century Indemnity Company (Century) from twoorders of the District Court, one entered May 18, 2006,granting a motion of appellee Certain Underwriters atLloyds, London (Lloyds) to compel arbitration of adisputed claim based on a set of reinsurance-of-reinsuranceagreements, and one entered May 30, 2008, denyingC</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Delia Berglund v. Pottawatomie County Board of Commissioners</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-6000&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41852</link>
<description>Plaintiffs-Appellants Delia Berglund and her daughter Darlene Vasquez (Plaintiffs) appeal the district courts grant of summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees Board of County Commissioners of Pottawatomie County, Pottawatomie County Sheriff Kurt Shirey, Pottawatomie County Sheriffs Deputy David Swearingen, and Pottawatomie County Sheriffs Deputy Anthony Rodriguez (Defendants</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robert Fisher v. The City of Las Cruces</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-2294&amp;s=NM&amp;d=41733</link>
<description>After Robert Fisher mistakenly shot himself twice, his wife called 911. Two officers responded to the call. Fisher alleges, despite the seriousness of the gunshot wounds to his bicep and stomach, the officers handcuffed him in a painful manner that exacerbated his injuries. Fisher filed suit, claiming the officers violated 42 U.S.C.  1983 by employing excessive force in violation of his Fourth A</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joseph Padgett v. A. Curtis Wright and Brian Loventhal; Lisa M. Rice</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-16720&amp;s=CA&amp;d=41722</link>
<description>A. Curtis Wright appeals the district courts denial of his motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity in this  1983 action. After this qualified immunity appeal was filed, the case went to trial, and a jury found Wright liable to appellee Joseph Padgett for deprivation of his First Amendment rights. We dismiss this appeal as moot.[1] Generally, denials of summary judgment</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rajina Hess v. Volkswagen of American, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009%20OK%20CIV%20APP%2084&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41999</link>
<description>1 Defendant, Volkswagen of America. Inc. (VW), appeals the trial court's certification of a class action. The question to be decided is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting class action status. We hold that it did not and affirm.FACTS2 Plaintiffs, Rajina Hess and Kelly Parsons, each own a Jetta automobile manufactured and/or sold by VW. Each vehicle was purchased used.3 </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Keith Myers v. Wesley C. Leedy</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=85S02-0808-CV-478&amp;s=IN&amp;d=41700</link>
<description>This case presents the question of whether a tenants leasehold interest in property survives a land contract vendees forfeiture when the tenant is not made a party to the forfeiture action and the vendor has actual knowledge that the tenant is in possession of the property. We conclude that in this case the tenants leasehold interest survives.Facts and Procedural HistoryOn August 13, 2002</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales &amp; Service, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009%20OK%2077&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41753</link>
<description>1 Certiorari was granted to settle the first-impression question whether a creditor who does not impose liability on a mortgage debtor for the deficiency that remains after a foreclosure sale may maintain a suit against the debtor and other parties for fraud in the inducement of the loan that is secured by mortgage. In short, we are asked to decide whether the mortgage debt's satisfaction under </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Melinda Coombs v. Adrian Curnow, M.D., and Russell Griffiths, M.D.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009%20Opinion%20No.%20124&amp;s=ID&amp;d=41744</link>
<description>This is an appeal from the district courts entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.) in favor of respondents in a medical malpractice case after the district court found that the appellants expert testimony regarding causation was scientifically unreliable. Because we find that the district judge impermissibly weighed the evidence in considering respondents motion and that </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Terri Conner v. Southfield Police Department, Michael Pieroni</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-1516&amp;s=MI&amp;d=41634</link>
<description>Detective Michael Pieroni appeals the district courts denial of summary judgment on his claim for qualified immunity. Pieroni interviewed plaintiff Terri Conner after she and her husband were arrested for carrying a concealed weapon. Mrs. Conner alleges that Pieroni kept her incarcerated even though he admitted knowing that Mrs. Conner was factually innocent of any crime. Mrs. Conner filed a 42</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>

