<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Abandonment Law - MoreLaw.com</title>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com</link>
<description>Abandonment Law - MoreLaw.com</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>&#169; Copyright 2008, MoreLaw.com Inc All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
<category>Recent Cases</category>
<item>
<title>World Harvest Church, Inc. v. Guideone Mutual Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-17258&amp;s=GA&amp;d=41878</link>
<description>This is an insurance case raising some questions of Georgia law.Without issuing a written reservation of rights, an insurer assumed the defense of a lawsuit for almost eleven months but stopped defending near the end of the discovery period because it decided that there was no coverage. At that point the policy holder hired its own attorneys to defend the lawsuit. About one month after the new att</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Derek Lewitton v. ITA Software, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-3725&amp;s=&amp;d=41912</link>
<description>Three months after Derek Lewitton stopped working for ITA Software, Inc. he attempted to exercise options to purchase 138,900 shares of ITA stock. According to Lewitton, those shares vested pursuant to his employment contract during his 25- month tenure with ITA. When ITA refused to allow Lewitton to purchase more than 34,722 shares, Lewitton filed this suit in Illinois state court claiming that I</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arnold Johnson v. Merlen Suttles</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009%20OK%20CIV%20APP%2089&amp;s=OK&amp;d=42003</link>
<description>1 Defendants, Merlen and Nancy Suttles, appeal the trial court's order granting Plaintiffs, Arnold and Wynema Johnson, an easement of necessity across Defendants' property to the upper portion of Plaintiffs' land. We affirm as modified herein.BACKGROUND2 In April 2006, Plaintiffs purchased a 75-acre tract of land located in Carter County, Oklahoma. The tract is located directly east and south </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joshua Richard Braunschweig v. Summer Rae Fahrenkrog f/k/a Summer Rae Frank</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08–0729&amp;s=IA&amp;d=41714</link>
<description>Appellee, Joshua Braunschweig, seeks further review of the court of appeals decision reversing the district courts grant of his application to change the surname of the parties minor child. The court of appeals determined the matter was governed by the name change procedures under Iowa Code chapter 674 instead of the procedures for initial name determinations under Iowa Code chapter 598. We </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Gary Minor</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009%20OK%20CIV%20APP%2083&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41998</link>
<description>1 In this condemnation action, the State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation (ODOT) appeals the trial court's May 29, 2008, Journal Entry of Judgment, granting attorney fees, appraisal fees, engineering fees, and costs to the appellee landowner, Gary Minor (Minor).1 Minor requests attorney fees for this appeal. After reviewing the facts and applicable law, we affirm and remand for f</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George Schmidt v. Chet Hepinstall</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=285071&amp;s=MI&amp;d=41683</link>
<description>Plaintiffs appeal as of right the order establishing both the eastern boundary of a lakefront parcel of plaintiffs property and the boundary between the parties residential properties. We affirm.Plaintiffs first argue that the trial court improperly determined the eastern boundary of their lakefront parcel, which abuts defendants property to the west. We review for clear error a trial cou</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>First American Bank v. First American Transportation Title Insurance Co.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=07-31033&amp;s=LA&amp;d=41669</link>
<description>Appellant First American Bank (First American or Bank) appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee First American Transportation Title Insurance Co. (FATTIC). The district court ruled that the measure of indemnity under First Americans insurance policy is limited to the amount by which the payments to the holders of the priming liens for necessaries reduced First Americans recov</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nancy Lazelle v. Estate of Leon I. Crabtree</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009%20OK%20CIV%20APP%2070&amp;s=OK&amp;d=41995</link>
<description>1 Nancy Lazelle (Plaintiff) appeals the trial court's order finding that the will executed by Leon Crabtree (Decedent) in Arizona on July 19, 2004, is valid in all respects. Based on a review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the decision of the trial court.BACKGROUND2 On May 9, 2006, Decedent died leaving five brothers and sisters. He left neither a surviving spouse nor children. In</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Tumbling-F Ranches v. Maricopa County</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=CV-07-0453&amp;s=AZ&amp;d=41725</link>
<description>1 Plaintiffs (the Farmers) appeal the trial courts denial of their motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) relating to their unsuccessful inverse eminent domain claim against the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (the District). On cross-appeal, the District challenges the negligence claim the Farmers successfully asserted against it. The District argues the F</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fort Worth &amp; Western Railroad Company and Cen-Tex Rural Rail Transportation District v. Enbridge Gat</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2-07-403-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=41554</link>
<description>Appellants Cen-Tex Rural Rail Transportation District and Fort Worth &amp; Western Railroad Company filed this interlocutory appeal from the trial court=s orders denying their pleas to the jurisdiction in three separate pipeline condemnation cases brought by appellees Worsham-Steed Gas Storage, L.P., Cowtown Pipeline Partners LP, and Enbridge Gathering (NE Texas Liquids), L.P.  The primary issue we mu</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Oct 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2009-1020,%20-1096&amp;s=&amp;d=41434</link>
<description>This is a patent case. Amgen Inc. (Amgen) is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,441,868 (the 868 patent), 5,547,933 (the 933 patent), 5,618,698 (the 698 patent), 5,756,349 (the 349 patent), and 5,955,422 (the 422 patent). The patents relate to the production of the protein erythropoietin (EPO) using recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michael G. Johnston v. Steven Cornelius</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A137037&amp;s=OR&amp;d=41385</link>
<description>Plaintiffs brought this action for interference with easement, alleging that defendants had blocked their access to a driveway easement across defendants' property in Deschutes County.  Defendants responded with counterclaims alleging that the easement had been extinguished either by abandonment or by adverse possession.  The trial court ruled in defendants' favor on both counterclaims and entered</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company v. Gallatin Fuels, Inc., etc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-8003&amp;s=WY&amp;d=41264</link>
<description>Appellants, referred to collectively hereafter as Gallatin, argue that the district court made a number of errors in entering an order of condemnation in favor of appellee Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) in regard to the 50-foot wide tract of land described in the caption (50-foot tract). Gallatin asserts six points of error. Because we find that none of them have m</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Terry Wolf and Florence Wolf v. Central Oregon &amp; Pacific Railroad, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A136347&amp;s=OR&amp;d=41053</link>
<description>Plaintiffs appeal following the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant.  Plaintiffs, who are owners of real property in Douglas County, Oregon (the Wolf property), brought this action against defendant, claiming a prescriptive easement that would allow them to continue to use the private crossing over defendant's railroad tracks that intersect their land.  They also sought d</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Roseann Amaro Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Deena Aiken, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC%2018305&amp;s=CT&amp;d=41196</link>
<description>In this appeal, we consider whether a municipal tax lien on a mobile home was extinguished when that mobile home was determined to have been abandoned and then sold at a public auction pursuant to General Statutes  21-80 (e).1 The plaintiff, Fairchild Heights, Inc., appeals2 from the judgments of the trial court denying its motion for an order conveying good title to, and a release of all liens </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Suzanna Sensing v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, LLC and Charles Kozmits</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-1865&amp;s=MA&amp;d=41159</link>
<description> This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in a diversity action. Plaintiff-appellant Suzanna Sensing, who suffers from multiple sclerosis, brought suit against her former employer, defendant-appellee Outback Steakhouse ("Outback"), and her manager, defendant-appellee Charles Kozmits, (collectively, "the appellees"), alleging handicap discrimination in violation of the Massachusetts anti-</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Caneyville Volunteer Fire Department, et al. v. Green's Motorcycle Salvage, Inc., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2007-SC-000517-DG&amp;s=&amp;d=40954</link>
<description>The present appeal comes to this Court by way of discretionary review from an action asserting negligence brought by Appellees, Orville Green, Catherine Green and Green's Motorcycle Salvage, Inc., against Appellants, Caneyville Volunteer Fire Department (hereinafter CVFD), the City of Caneyville and CVFD Fire Chief, Anthony Clark. At the outset, we note that the City of Caneyville was entitled to </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elizabeth Sanchez v. </title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=E045200&amp;s=CA&amp;d=41013</link>
<description>Plaintiff Elizabeth Sanchez was a high-ranking employee of the County of San Bernardino (the County), widely regarded as a rising superstar. Among her other accomplishments, she negotiated a labor contract with the Safety Employees Benefits Association (the Association), the labor union responsible for representing sheriffs deputies. Thereafter, however, she and James Erwin, the president</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George R. Drummond v. Michael G. Desmaris</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=H031659&amp;s=CA&amp;d=40914</link>
<description>Plaintiffs George Drummond, Rebecca Drummond, and Jesse Marion brought this action against their former attorney, Michael Desmarais, and others, alleging that Desmarais maliciously prosecuted two previous suits against plaintiffs, one seeking to recover fees claimed under a contract to provide legal services to plaintiffs in connection with the estate of their deceased father, and the other allegi</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>American National Fire Insurance Company v. York County</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-2439&amp;s=ME&amp;d=41161</link>
<description> Class actions, by their very nature, can alter the usual dynamics of litigation and bring to bear on defendants and insurers alike intense pressure to settle. See, e.g., Waste Mgmt. Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray, 208 F.3d 288, 293 (1st Cir. 2000) (discussing situations in which "the grant of class status raises the stakes of the litigation so substantially that the defendant likely will feel irresist</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>George R. Drummond, et al. v. Michael G. Desmarais, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=H031659&amp;s=CA&amp;d=41014</link>
<description>Plaintiffs George Drummond, Rebecca Drummond, and Jesse Marion brought this action against their former attorney, Michael Desmarais, and others, alleging that Desmarais maliciously prosecuted two previous suits against plaintiffs, one seeking to recover fees claimed under a contract to provide legal services to plaintiffs in connection with the estate of their deceased father, and the other allegi</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sally L. Moody, et al. v. Allegheny Valley Land Trust, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=22%20WAP%202008&amp;s=PA&amp;d=40774</link>
<description>In this appeal, we hold that as long as the requirements of Section 1247(d) of the National Trails System Act are met, a railroad right-of-way is railbanked regardless of whether the rail operator agrees to resuscitate service. Accordingly, we affirm the Superior Courts decision below.Railbanking is the preservation of an easement that was previously used as a rail thoroughfare by allowin</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trizechahn Gateway, LLC v. Paul H. Titus, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=51-53%20WAP%202008&amp;s=PA&amp;d=40773</link>
<description>This appeal involves a commercial landlord/tenant dispute in which the tenant, a now-dissolved law firm, defaulted on rent payments and moved out of the building with several years remaining on the lease. The legal questions raised pertain to individual partner liability, lease interpretation, and the award of counsel fees.I. BackgroundIn 1995, a third-party landlord and the law firm of Titus &amp; Mc</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>M.M. Silta, Inc.  v.  Cliffs Erie, L.L.C.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-2620&amp;s=MN&amp;d=40674</link>
<description>M.M. Silta, Inc. (Silta)1 brought this breach of contract action against Cliffs Erie, L.L.C. (Cliffs), alleging that Cliffs failed to perform its obligations under two agreements stemming from reclamation of a Minnesota taconite mine.2 A jury returned a verdict for Silta on one of its contract claims, and Cliffs appeals, arguing that the district court3 submitted an erroneous jury instruction, tha</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bret "Doc" Berkman v. City of Keene</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=10-08-00073-CV&amp;s=TX&amp;d=40886</link>
<description>Bret Doc Berkman filed suit against the City of Keene alleging that the City was obligated to furnish water and sewer services to his property at no charge under an agreement between the City and Berkmans predecessors in title.  The court granted the Citys summary-judgment motion.  Berkman contends in three issues that the court erred: (1) by failing to recognize the mandatory nature o</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>

