<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title> Law - MoreLaw.com</title>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com</link>
<description> Law - MoreLaw.com</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>&#169; Copyright 2008, MoreLaw.com Inc All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
<category>Recent Cases</category>
<item>
<title>Earl Borden v. Allstate Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-30515&amp;s=la&amp;d=42043</link>
<description>Plaintiff Earl Borden (Borden) appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) and insurance agent Greg Ruiz (Ruiz) denying coverage for his Hurricane Katrina flood loss. Borden argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and, alternatively, that material fact issues precluded summary judgment. We hold that th</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robin L. Pepper v. Routh Crabtree, P.C., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=S-13042&amp;s=AK&amp;d=42050</link>
<description>Robin Pepper sued an Anchorage debt collection agency and its lawyers, claiming that they violated Alaskas Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (UTPA) when they: (1) sued Pepper in state district court without first sending a written demand, (2) misrepresented to the court that Pepper was competent, and (3) applied for default judgment without first informing Peppers attorney. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fair Isaac Corporation v. Equifax, Inc., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=06-04112&amp;s=MN&amp;d=42038</link>
<description>Fair Isaac sued Equifax and others on trademark infringement, unfair competition and a deceptive trade practice theories claiming that Defendants' credit scoring system that competes with Plaintiff's widely used "FICO" scoring system.Experian and TransUion called their credit scoring system "VantageScore" and used ratings from 501 to 990 while plaintiff used 300 to 850. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alexander Alhovsky v. City of New York, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=1:07-cv-07628-CM&amp;s=NY&amp;d=42036</link>
<description>Alexander Alhovsky sued Officer Thomas Ryan and others on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming that he sustained physical and emotional injuries for being arrested without probable cause for leaving a a divice for inflating balloons in a Starbucks in 2006.  Alhovsky, who is a professional clown, left the device in the Starbucks.  Store employees called the New York Police </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cindy Naugle v. Philip Morris</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=&amp;s=FL&amp;d=42035</link>
<description>Cindy Naugle sued Philip Morris on a products liability theory claiming that the cigarettes manufactured and sold by it were defective and unreasonably dangerous.  As a direct result of smoking, Plaintiff developed severe emphysema from being addicted to nicotine and from smoking for 25 years. Naugle, age 61, gave up smoking in 1993.  She cannot walk but a few steps.Philip Morris denied responsi</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Berry &amp; Murphy, P.C. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=09-1004&amp;s=CO&amp;d=42034</link>
<description>Plaintiffs-Appellants Berry &amp; Murphy, P.C. and Timothy H. Berry, P.C. (plaintiffs) appeal the district courts grant of summary judgment to Defendant- Appellee Carolina Casualty Insurance Company (Carolina Casualty) on plaintiffs claim for insurance coverage for a malpractice lawsuit. Plaintiffs filed their action in state court and Carolina Casualty removed the case to federal co</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Melissa Harman v. Brent Polluck</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-4068&amp;s=UT&amp;d=42032</link>
<description>In this ongoing action under 42 U.S.C.  1983, a previous panel of this court determined that various material factual disputes remained regarding the constitutionality of the near two-hour early morning detention of Melissa Harman and Justin Overton (or the Plaintiffs), and the corresponding after-midnight searches of their garage apartment conducted by officers who worked for the Utah Dep</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Patricia Fierle v. Jorge Perez, M.D., Ltd., et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=125%20Nev.%20Adv.%20Op.%20No.%2054&amp;s=NV&amp;d=42044</link>
<description>Appellants Patricia Fierle and her husband, Daniel Fierle, filed a complaint against Dr. Jorge Perez, members of his staff, and his professional medical corporation.  The complaint stemmed from an incident where Patricia suffered severe burns from chemotherapy treatment that Dr. Perezs staff administered.  After initially failing to attach an expert affidavit to the complaint, the Fierles then </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robert Davis v. Ford Motor Credit Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B204047&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42042</link>
<description>Plaintiff and appellant Robert Davis (Davis) appeals a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining without leave to amend of a demurrer interposed by defendant and appellant Ford Motor Credit Company LLC (Ford) to Daviss original complaint.Ford also appeals, seeking review of a postjudgment order denying its motion for attorney fees.This litigation relates to Fords billing practices u</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Deana Dowell, et al. v. Biosense Webster, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B201439&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42041</link>
<description>Plaintiffs and Appellants St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. (SC) and Pacesetter, Inc. (Pacesetter) (collectively, St. Jude), along with employees Deana Dowell, Steven Chapman and Claudio Plaza, sued Defendant and Cross-appellant Biosense Webster, Inc. (Biosense) to enjoin it from enforcing noncompete and nonsolicitation clauses in employment agreements used in California, including agreements it had wit</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Martin Kelley v. CB&amp;I Constructors, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B205735&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42040</link>
<description>A jury found that defendant CB&amp;I Constructors, Inc. (defendant) negligently sparked a brush fire that caused significant damage to a ranch (the property) owned by plaintiff Martin Kelly (plaintiff). Because plaintiff had a personal reason to restore the property, the jury awarded plaintiff substantially more in damages to restore the property than the property was worth immediately before the fire</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>David Hoffman v. Smithwoods RV Park, L.L.C.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=H033464&amp;s= C&amp;d=42039</link>
<description>This appeal follows a judgment of dismissal, entered after the trial court sustained the defendants demurrer without leave to amend. At issue is whether the defendant engaged in actionable conduct when it refused to permit the installation of a new mobile home in its mobile home park, to replace an older one that the plaintiff had inherited. As alleged in the complaint, the defendants refusa</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>LaQuinta Reherman v. St. John Health System, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=4:09-cv-00624-GKF-TLW&amp;s=OK&amp;d=42030</link>
<description>LaQuita Reherman sued St. John Health Systems, Inc. on a civil rights violation theory under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) claiming that Defendant failed to accommodate her job as a scrub technician.  Plaintiff who is hearing impaired could not function in operating rooms where doctors insisted on playing loud music while performing surgery.  Plaintiff was removed from her operating ro</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Richard Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=B200006&amp;s=CA&amp;d=42029</link>
<description>In this products liability lawsuit, plaintiffs Richard Merrill and Tamara Merrill sued defendants Leslie Controls, Inc. (Leslie Controls) and Elliott Company for Richard Merrills injuries caused by exposure to asbestos-containing products. Leslie Controls appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs. We conclude that plaintiffs have not shown that Leslie Controls manufactured, supplied, or distribute</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In Re: Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=05-4181,%20etc.&amp;s=LA&amp;d=42028</link>
<description>Plaintiffs sued the United States Corp of Engineers on a governmental tort claim theory claiming that the Corp negligently failed to maintain the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and, as a direct, result winds, rain and flooding associated with Hurricane Katrina breached the navigation channel's levies flooding the Lover Ninth Ward of New Orleans.  The stormed killed 1,600 people in Louisiana and Mis</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cell Therapeutics, Inc. v. Lash Group, Inc.; Documedics Acquisition Co., Inc.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-35619&amp;s=WA&amp;d=42027</link>
<description>The False Claims Act (FCA) was designed to encourage reporting of false or fraudulent claims that are submitted to the federal government for approval or payment. Typically a relatora whistle-blowing employee, a business partner or competitorbrings suit for the benefit of the United States. Mortgages, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 934 F.2d 209, 210 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam). The gov</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Darrel L. Bouy v. Soo Hee Kim and Enjua Connie Kim</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A137017&amp;s=OR&amp;d=42049</link>
<description>This case concerns a landlord's liability for harm to a tenant's guest caused by the dangerous condition of a tenant improvement to leased property.  Plaintiff was seriously injured when he fell while descending stairs to the entrance of a manufactured dwelling.  The dwelling was situated in a leased space in a mobile home park.  Plaintiff filed negligence claims against Archuleta, the owner of th</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kristie Laird v. Allstate Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A137006&amp;s=OR&amp;d=42048</link>
<description>Defendant issued an automobile liability insurance policy and a personal umbrella policy covering a car involved in an accident that resulted in the death of plaintiff's husband.  The auto policy contains an omnibus clause that provides that the policy covers anyone using the car with the permission of the "policyholder."  Plaintiff brought an action against the driver and a passenger in the car, </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robert Prehall v. Paul F. Weigel and Donald Whitaker</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A133563&amp;s=OR&amp;d=42047</link>
<description>The parties organized a limited liability company (LLC), ORS 63.001(17), for the purpose of developing a residential subdivision.  Plaintiff later brought this action against defendants for damages for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and an accounting.  His claims arise out of defendants' alleged wrongful conduct in carrying out the terms of the operating agreements that gover</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jane Doe v. Medford School District 549C</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A137804&amp;s=OR&amp;d=42046</link>
<description>Medford School District 549C adopted a policy that prohibits its employees from possessing firearms on school district property or at school-sponsored events.  Plaintiff, a school district employee who wishes to carry a handgun while teaching, initiated this declaratory judgment action challenging the lawfulness of that policy.  The scope of that challenge is a narrow one:  Plaintiff contends that</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Willamette Oaks, L.L.C. v. City of Eugene, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=A142351&amp;s=OR&amp;d=42045</link>
<description>Petitioner, Willamette Oaks, LLC, seeks review of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision affirming the City of Eugene's (city) approval of a zone change for certain land from medium-density residential to limited high-density residential, contending that LUBA's order is unlawful in substance.  We review pursuant to ORS 197.850 and, on review, hold that LUBA improperly concluded that the cit</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marvin W. Couch, II, M.D. v. Board of Trustees of the Memorial Hospital of Carbon County, et al.</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=08-8001&amp;s=WY&amp;d=42033</link>
<description>Dr. Marvin Wayne Couch appeals from summary judgment entered in favorof defendants, Memorial Hospital of Carbon County (MHCC), a small ruralhospital where he has staff privileges, the hospitals chief administrator, and sixof the ten other physicians who have privileges at MHCC. Dr. Couch brought thisaction, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.  1983, to remedy an alleged deprivation of his FirstA</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saint Louis University and Paulo Bicalho, M.D. v. Alice Geary</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC89840&amp;s=MO&amp;d=42022</link>
<description>Saint Louis University (SLU) and Paulo Bicalho, M.D., appeal the judgment in favor of Phillip Sgroi and his wife, Alice Geary, in a medical negligence action. A jury found Dr. Bicalho negligent for failing to timely diagnose and treat Mr. Sgrois fractured hip and found SLU, Dr. Bicalhos employer, vicariously liable for his negligence. SLU and Dr. Bicalho present three issues on appeal:</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Charles Robertson Watson v. Robert K. Mense</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC89936&amp;s=MO&amp;d=42021</link>
<description>The Watsons brought actions for ejectment, trespass, quiet title and the establishment of an easement by prescription against the Menses regarding parcels of farmland. The trial court found in favor of the Watsons. The trial courts judgement as to ejectment damages is reversed. The trial court is required to enter a more definite legal description of the new borderline between the partys par</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Steve Ritchie and Anita Ritchie v. Allied Property &amp; Casualty Insurance Company</title>
<author>kent@morelaw.com (Kent Morlan)</author>
<link>http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=SC90085&amp;s=MO&amp;d=42020</link>
<description>Steve and Anita Ritchie sued Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company seeking $300,000 in underinsured motorist coverage under their Allied policy for the wrongful death of their daughter, Kelsey Ritchie. The trial court held that the Ritchies were entitled to recover this amount, finding the anti-stacking and set-off provisions of the policy unenforceable.This Court affirms, but on differen</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel></rss>

