| Maryland Conflict of Law Law |
| |
|
Michael A. Freedman v. Comcast Corporation, et al.
|
|
Appellant, Michael A. Freedman, claimed that appellee, the group of corporate entities known and commonly referred to as “Comcast,” violated the 1997 Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, Md. Code (1974, 2006 Repl. Vol.), § 10- 402 et seq. of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJ”). Appellant filed suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and the parties fil... More... $0 (01-29-2010 - MD)
|
|
Paul F. Worsham v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
|
|
The question presented by this appeal is whether the applicable statute of limitations for a claim filed in Maryland pursuant to the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) is four years – based upon the federal “catch all” limitation period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1658(a) – or three years – based upon the Maryland general civil limitation period set forth in Mar... More... $0 (10-05-2009 - MD)
|
|
Barrington D. Henry v. Gateway, Inc., et al.
|
|
The central issue in this case is whether, in the absence of a controlling decision by the U.S. Supreme Court and in the face of divided federal precedent, a Maryland court is bound to apply a contractual choice-of-law clause that has the effect of interpreting federal law in a manner inconsistent with a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland. We conclude that it would be contrary to the fun... More... $0 (08-31-2009 - MD)
|
|
Choice Hotels International v. SM Property Management, LLC, Say-Hai Cun; May D. Cun
|
|
Below, Franchisor Choice Hotels International (Franchisor) sought
to confirm a $264,305.02 arbitration award (the Arbitration Award)
obtained by default against S.M. Property Management, L.L.C., Say-
Hai Cun, and his wife May Duong Cun (collectively Franchisees). In
response, Franchisees moved to vacate the arbitration award for lack
of notice. The district court declined to confirm the arbit... More... $0 (02-29-2008 - MD)
|
