M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Parental Rights Law
 
United States v. Jesus Sotelo-Valdovinos District of Minnesota Federal Courthouse - Minneapolis, Minnesota

Eduardo Penaloza-Romero was a leader of a drug trafficking organization that
transported methamphetamine from California and distributed it in Minneapolis and
St. Paul, Minnesota. Jesus Sotelo-Valdovinos assisted by arranging a delivery of
methamphetamine from California to Minnesota and encouraging more trafficking
after the driver was arrested. Penaloza-Romero and Sotelo-Valdovin... More...
   $0 (02-09-2018 - MN)

United States of America v. Dwight Hamilton Northern District of Georgia Federal Courthouse - Atlanta, Georgia

Atlanta, GA - Former Jail Sergeant Sentenced to Federal Prison For Abusing Inmate at DeKalb County Jail

Dwight Hamilton, 54, of Atlanta, Georgia, was sentenced on February 9, 2018 to one year in prison, three years’ supervised release, and a $100 special assessment for abusing a female inmate by tasing her without any legitimate justification. Leonard Dreyer, Hamilton’s former supervisor... More...
   $0 (02-09-2018 - GA)

Sonny Low v. Trump University, LLC, ak/a Trump Entrepreneur Initiative and Donald Trump Southern District of California Federal Courthouse - San Diego, California

Trump University, now defunct, was a for-profit entity that purported to teach Donald J. Trump’s “secrets of success” in the real estate industry. During the 2016 presidential election, Trump University and Trump were defendants in three lawsuits alleging fraud and violations of various state and federal laws: two class actions in the Southern District of California, and a suit by the New York Att... More...   $0 (02-09-2018 - CA)

Maria J. Barahona, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Central District of California Federal Courthouse - Los Angeles, California

For more than half a century, the Union Pacific Railroad
(“Union Pacific”) has leased land under 1,800 miles of its
right of way to Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, L.P. (“SFPP”),
which uses the land for a petroleum pipeline. In a suit by
landowners challenging Union Pacific’s ability to lease the
land, the district court held that (1) the acts of Congress
conferring the right o... More...
   $0 (02-09-2018 - CA)

Seanlim Yith and Seak Leang Yith v. Kristen Nielsen, et al. Eastern District of California Federal Courthouse - Fresno, California

Seanlim and Seak Leang Yith appeal from the district
court’s dismissal of their complaint requesting adjudication
of their naturalization applications pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
§ 1447(b). Relying on 8 U.S.C. § 1429, the district court
concluded that the Yiths were precluded from obtaining any
relief because they were concurrently in removal proceedings.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1429 (prov... More...
   $0 (02-09-2018 - CA)

Juan D. Vega, Jr. v. United States of America, et al. Western District of Washington Federal Courthouse - Seattle, Washington

Juan Vega, Jr. was transferred from federal prison to a Seattle non-profit residential reentry center to complete the remainder of his prison sentence. There, he alleged that federal and private employees conspired to remove him from the halfway house known as Pioneer House, ostensibly based on his race and for asserting his First Amendment rights, by filing a false incident report. After his retu... More...   $0 (02-09-2018 - WA)

San Francisco Apartment Association v. City and County of San Francisco

We must determine whether a San Francisco city
ordinance limiting the rights of landlords to commence and
conduct buyout negotiations is consistent with the federal
and state constitutions. We do not, as we must not, evaluate
the policy merits of the ordinance. Appellants—an
individual property owner and several organizations that
represent landlords’ interests in San Franc... More...
   $0 (02-09-2018 - CA)

Clayton Douglas v. Serenivision, Inc.

There is a “strong presumption that courts should
determine the jurisdiction of arbitrators.” (Sandquist v. Lebo
Automotive, Inc. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 233, 249 (Sandquist).) Parties
may nevertheless agree to let an arbitrator decide his or her own
jurisdiction, at least if their agreement to do so is “‘clear[] and
unmistakabl[e].’” (Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002)
5... More...
   $0 (02-08-2018 - CA)

William Cordoba v. Silvia Pulido Northern District of California Federal Courthouse - San Francisco

Oakland, CA - Jury Awards Convicted Killer $115,000 For Being Turned Into a Sex Slave

William Cordoba, age 57, sued Silvia Pulido on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming that he was forced to engage in sexual activities by Pulido who taught janitorial skills at San Quentin and for whom he was a clerk.... More...
   $0 (02-08-2018 - CA)

State of Missouri v. Gregory Allen Heidbrink Warren County Courthouse - Warrenton, Missouri

Gregory Alan Heidbrink (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment
entered after a jury trial convicting him of receiving stolen property. We affirm in part,
reverse in part, and remand for resentencing.
Factual and Procedural Background
The State charged Appellant, as a prior and persistent offender, with one count of
receiving stolen property, a class C Felony, in vio... More...
   $0 (02-08-2018 - MO)

Donald Morgan v. Michael Robinson District of Nebraska Federal Courthouse - Lincoln, Nebraska

After Donald Morgan ran against his boss Michael Robinson, the incumbent
sheriff, in a primary election, Robinson terminated Morgan’s employment as a deputy
with the Washington County, Nebraska Sheriff’s Office for statements Morgan made
during the campaign. Morgan then brought this First Amendment retaliation action
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Robinson moved for summary judgment o... More...
   $0 (02-08-2018 - )

United States of America v. Randy Metcalf Northern District of Iowa Federal Courthouse - Dubuque, Iowa

A jury convicted Randy Joe Metcalf of committing a hate crime in violation of
the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, 18
U.S.C. § 249(a)(1) (the Act). The district cou 1 rt2 sentenced Metcalf to the statutory
maximum sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment. Metcalf appeals, arguing that the
Act is unconstitutional because Congress lacked the author... More...
   $0 (02-08-2018 - IA)

Larry Gene Burks v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections Easter District of Arkansas Federal Courthouse - Pine Bluff, Arkansas

Larry Burks was convicted of rape in Arkansas and sentenced to thirty years in
prison. When Burks, more than five years later, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, there was a dispute about whether the petition was timely.
The district court determined that the one-year statute of limitations should be
equitably tolled and deemed Burks’s petition timely. T... More...
   $0 (02-08-2018 - AR)

State of Oklahoma v. Stanley Vernon Majors Tulsa County Courthouse - Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tulsa, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Stanley Vernon Majors with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: HM11, MURDER - FIRST DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S. 701.7
Date of Offense: 08/12/2016
Party Name Disposition Information
MAJORS, STANLEY VERNON
Count # 2. Count as Filed: WE6, POSSESSION OF A FIREARM AFCF, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283
Date of Offense: 08/12/2016
... More...
   $0 (02-07-2018 - OK)

United States of America v. Deangelo Anderson Eastern District of Wisconsin Federal Courthouse - Milwaukee, Wisconsin

On September 23, 2014, a grand jury
returned a five-count indictment against Deangelo Anderson,
charging him in counts one and two with armed robbery of a
bank and brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of
violence (i.e. the bank robbery), and in counts three, four and
2 No. 16-3112
five with unlawful possession of a firearm as a felon, possession
of crack coca... More...
   $0 (02-07-2018 - WI)

Marina Pacifica Homeowners Association v. Southern California Financial Corporation

Both plaintiff and defendant appeal from a postjudgment
order concluding neither of them was the prevailing party in
litigation over an assignment fee, and consequently neither of
them was entitled to attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717
(section 1717) or to costs under Code of Civil Procedure
section 1032 (section 1032). We affirm the trial court’s order.
FACTS
... More...
   $0 (02-06-2018 - CA)

Superior Communications, d/b/a Smile FM v. City of Riverview, Michigan Eastern District of Michigan Federal Courthouse - Detroit, Michigan

This appeal concerns a dispute over whether
Superior Communications can significantly expand and upgrade its radio broadcast equipment
>
No. 17-1234 Superior Commc’ns v. City of Riverview, Mich. Page 2
located on a telecommunications tower owned by the City of Riverview, Michigan. Though
Superior alleges violations of the Telecommunications Act and of its constitutional rights,... More...
   $0 (02-06-2018 - MI)

United States of America v. Talman Harri Northern District of Ohio Courthouse - Cleveland, Ohio

Talman Harris appeals his criminal convictions and sentences,
arguing that the district court erred by: (1) barring Harris from impeaching a government
>
No. 17-3087 United States v. Harris Page 2
witness; (2) admitting government summary evidence; (3) giving an inaccurate jury instruction
with regard to a stockbroker’s fiduciary duties; and (4) failing to investigate potential... More...
   $0 (02-06-2018 - OH)

Steven Mora v. Webcor Construction, L.P.

California Labor Code section 226, subdivision (a) (Section 226(a)), requires
employers to provide employees wage statements itemizing, among other things, all
wages earned, including the hours worked and applicable rates of pay. Plaintiff and
appellant Steven Mora (appellant) contends defendant and respondent Webcor
Construction, L.P. (respondent) violated Section 226(a) by faili... More...
   $0 (02-06-2018 - CA)

Grand Mesa Pipeline LLC v. Donna Elizabeth Ward Payne County Courthouse - Stillwater, Oklahoma

Stillwater, OK - Grand Mesa Pipeline LLC used Donna Elizabeth Ward on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by her for the construction of a pipeline.

Docket
Date Code Description Count Party Amount
08-17-2015 TEXT

CIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000 INITIAL FILING.
1
08-17-2015 CONDEMN ... More...
   $0 (02-05-2018 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Silvia Margarita Cardenas Beaver County Courthouse - Beaver, Oklahoma

Beaver, OK - The State of Oklahoma v. Silvia Margarita CardenasState of Oklahoma charged Silvia Margarita Cardenas with:

1. DRIVING A VEHICLE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL,AGGREVATED, in violation of 47 OS 11-902(A)(2)

2. TRANSPORTING OPENED CONTAINER OF BEER, in violation of 21 OS 1220

Citation Information

Arresting Agency: N/A
Location of O... More...
   $0 (02-05-2018 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Trevor Shanye Frydendall Beaver County Courthouse - Beaver, Oklahoma

Beaver, OK - TheState of Oklahoma charged Trevor Shanye Frydendall with:

1. BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of 21 OS 1435

2. GRAND LARCENY

3. CONSPIRACY

4. KNOWINGLY CONCEALING STOLEN PROPERTY

5. BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of 21 OS 1435

6. GRAND LARCENY

7. CONSPIRACY

8. KNOW... More...
   $0 (02-05-2018 - OK)

Dana Jennifer Engstrom v. James McCarthy

¶1 Dana Engstrom (“Mother”) and James McCarthy (“Father”)
both challenge the parenting time and legal decision-making terms of the
decree dissolving their marriage. Because we find their Arizona Rule of
Family Law Procedure (“Rule”) 69 agreement binding and no explanation
in the record for any modification, we vacate the legal decision-making and
parenting time orders and reman... More...
   $0 (02-05-2018 - AZ)

Judith Pinborough Zimmerman, Ph.D. v. University of Utah and Dr. William McMahon Utah Supreme Court of Utah - Salt Lake City, Utah

¶1 This case comes to us on certification from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. UTAH R. APP. P. 41. The certified questions are as follows:
1. Is the Free Speech Clause of the Utah Constitution self-executing? 2. If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, what are the elements of a claim brought under the clause? 3. Does an employee who receives notice that his or ... More...
   $0 (02-05-2018 - UT)

United States of America v. Omar Dupraz Crittington Western District of North Carolina Courthouse - Charlotte, North Carolina

Omar Dupraz Crittington appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 7-month prison term and 1-year term of supervised release. He contends that his due process rights were violated because the district court failed to ensure he made a knowing and voluntary admission to violating the terms of his supervised release and waiver of his rights under Fed. R.... More...   $0 (02-04-2018 - NC)

Next Page

 
 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2018 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.