Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Black operated a dental office in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and employed an office manager who had allegedly engaged in extensive employee theft, misappropriation of funds, and fraud.

The Defendant, Hanover American Insurance Company (“Hanover”) issued a ... More...   $0 (03-26-2024 - OK)

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Premises liability laws in Oklahoma, distinguish between visitors who are invitees, licensees, or trespassers.

A property owner has the highest duty of care to an invitee. An invitee is someone who has been asked to come onto the property by the owner.
More...   $1 (03-26-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with embezzlement between $2,500 and $15,000 in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides:



A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the frau... More...   $0 (03-26-2024 - OK)

Cherokee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with grand larceny of in house and knowingly receiving or concealing stolen property.... More...   $0 (03-26-2024 - OK)

San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County, C22-02469, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability laws in California are based on negligence, which is represented under Civil Code §1714(a). I... More...   $1 (03-26-2024 - CA)

Tampa, Florida personal injury, slip and fall, trip and fall, lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the Fifth Judicial Circuit, 23000711CA, and was removed to federal court by Tractor Supply Company, et al.

Under Florida law, the owner of a property, or tenant such as a shop owner, is responsible for maintaining a premis... More...   $1 (03-25-2024 - FL)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173 and being a peeping tom in violation of 21 O.S. 1171.

21 O.S. 1173 provides:

A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that:

1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate famil... More...   $0 (03-25-2024 - OK)

Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Kern County Superior Court, BCV-22-102269 DZ, and was removed to federal court by Home Depot.

Premises liability laws in California are based on negligence, which is represented under Civil Code §1714(a). In a premises liability c... More...   $0 (03-25-2024 - CA)

Tampa, Florida personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Under Florida law, the owner of a property, or tenant such as a shop owner, is responsible for maintaining a premise or property in a reasonable condition free of hazards. A failure to do so may create liability if an injury results to a visitor from negligent maintenanc... More...   $0 (03-22-2024 - FL)

Kansas City, Kansas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Kansas has adopted the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (“NAIC”) Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Model Regulation (1981), subject to certain limited exceptions. K.A.R. 40-1-34. This means that an insurer presented with a property and casu... More...   $1 (03-22-2024 - KS)

Peoria, Illinois personal injury slip and fall law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability law revolves around holding property owners and operators accountable if their careless or negligent actions cause harm to those who have a right to be on the premises. As with any personal injury case in Illinois, a premises liability... More...   $1 (03-22-2024 - IL)

Waycross, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology, Orthopaedics and Spine that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes.... More...   $0 (03-21-2024 - GA)

Portland, Maine personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Knox County Superior Court, CV-22-XX, and was removed to federal court by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC

In general, premises liability means that owners have a responsibility to take reasonable steps to ensure that their property is safe. When... More...   $0 (03-20-2024 - ME)

Des Moines, Iowa personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the Story County District Court, LACV053320, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Iowa property owners have a legal obligation to maintain safe conditions on their property. Both businesses and private citizens must elimina... More...   $1 (03-20-2024 - IA)

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Saline County Circuit Court, 63CV-22-01168-2, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Premises liability is a form of personal injury law in Arkansas that deals with accidents that occur on property owned by an individual or a legal ent... More...   $1 (03-20-2024 - AR)

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Franklin County, Illinois, case number 22-LA-56, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

(740 ILCS 130/1)

Sec. 1. This Act is called and may be cited as the "Premises Liability Act".

S... More...   $1 (03-20-2024 - IL)

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Hamilton Circuit Court, 29C01-2305-CT-004403, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Premises liability law in Indiana is designed to protect individuals who are injured on another person's property due to the propert... More...   $0 (03-20-2024 - IN)