San Diego, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, 37-02023-0004190-CU-BC-CTL, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. ... More...   $1 (03-19-2024 - CA)

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was file in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2022-091842, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Arizona, property owners and occupiers have a duty to protect visitors from injuries arising from known dangers on their property. Whe... More...   $0 (03-19-2024 - AZ)

Rapid City, South Dakota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"South Dakota recognizes insurance bad faith. As explained by the Supreme Court of South Dakota, “[a] cause of action against an insurance company for bad faith failure to pay a claim is recognized in South Dakota.” Stene v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. C... More...   $0 (03-19-2024 - SD)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with embezzlement by employee in violation of 21 O.S.C. 1451, which provides:

A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to approp... More...   $0 (03-18-2024 - OK)

El Dorado, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Negligence, the legal theory behind most injury lawsuits, is the violation of a duty owed to another individual. In other words, to do something (or not do something) a "reasonable person" wouldn't (or would) do -- such as driving drunk or failing to ensure the safety ... More...   $1 (03-18-2024 - AR)

Des Moines, Iowa insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff which sued seeking a declaratory judgment.

Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company alleged it has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Charles McCarthy and his estate against abuse claims by the Individual Defendants or to pay a settlement that the defendants reached resolving their underlying claims in state court. ... More...   $0 (03-15-2024 - IA)

Kansas City, Missouri criminal defense lawyers represented the defendants charged with illegal firearms trafficking and straw purchases of firearms as a result of the investigation into the mass shooting at Union Station during the celebration of the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl victory on Feb. 14, 2024.

“These cases underscore the importance of enforcing federal firearms laws,” said... More...   $0 (03-15-2024 - IA)

Detroit, Michigan personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on premises liability theories.

This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court, 23-01127-NO, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.


Premises liability cases are like other negligence cases in that the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty owed to the plainti... More...   $0 (03-14-2024 - MI)

Columbus, Georgia insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

When businesses enter into contracts, they have an implied duty to act honestly, in good faith, and fairly. When they do not, they can be sued for a breach of this duty. Here, we discuss this duty of good faith and fair dealings and bad faith claims in the business... More...   $1 (03-13-2024 - GA)

Fresno, California insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Bakersfield Superior Court, BCV-21-100909, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so, they breach the... More...   $0 (03-08-2024 - CA)

Lincoln, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the District Court of Dawson County, CI 23-00145, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Premises liability law is summarized by the idea that a landowner has a legal obligation to protect visitors invited onto their land from... More...   $0 (03-08-2024 - NE)

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Fairfax County Circuit Court, CL-22-0013195, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Virginia law is clear that owners and/or occupants of a premises may be held liable for injuries caused to other people by ... More...   $0 (03-07-2024 - VA)

Austin, Texas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract.

Bad faith insurance refers to a situation in which an insured individual has a grievance against an insurance company due to its unlawful and inappropriate handling of claims.

Insurance companies are bound by a duty of good faith and fair dealing towards their client... More...   $0 (03-07-2024 - TX)

Detroit, Michigan personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability cases are like other negligence cases in that the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty owed to the plaintiff by the defendant, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) an injury proximately resulting from that breach, and (4) dam... More...   $1 (03-06-2024 - MI)

Baltimore, Maryland insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

Maryland law recognizes a tort cause of action by an insured party where an insurer refuses in bad faith to settle a third-party's claim against the insured. Mesmer v. Md Auto. Ins. Fund, 353 Md. 241, 725 A.2d 1053, 1061-62 (Md. 1999).The basis for the insurer's... More...   $0 (03-06-2024 - MD)